People browsing colorful fabrics at a Bengaluru street market.
Photo by Aditya Oberai on Pexels

Karnataka State Consumer Commission Case Overview: Michel Nisha Silma Pinto vs The Secretary

Case Background And Overview

Legal proceedings often involve intricate details regarding dates, jurisdictions, and representation. A notable matter came before the Karnataka State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Principal Bench, shedding light on consumer rights and appellate procedures within the state.

Filing And Disposal Timelines

The initial filing of the matter took place on November 16, 2022. After a thorough judicial review process, the official disposal of the case was successfully reached on September 4, 2026.

Judicial Bench Composition

The presiding authority during the adjudication process included key judicial figures. The bench was led by the President, Honble Mr Justice T G Shivashankare Gowda, alongside the Lady Member, Honble Mrs Divyashree M.

Appellant Representation Details

The appellants involved in the proceedings included Mr Michel Nisha Silma Pinto, a thirty-four-year-old individual represented through his Special Power of Attorney holder, Mr Wilfred Pinto. The residential address associated with this party is located at Pearl Samethadka, near Sudhana Sports Club, in Puttur Taluk, Dakshina Kannada District. Legal representation for the appellant was managed by advocate Mr Krishnamoorthy D.

Additional Parties Involved

Another related filing featured Mr Merwyn Neil Wilson Pinto, also aged thirty-four years. Similar to the co-appellant, this individual was represented by the Special Power of Attorney holder Mr Wilfred Pinto, sharing the same residential jurisdiction in Dakshina Kannada District and receiving counsel from advocate Mr Krishnamoorthy D.

Significance Of Consumer Forums

Consumer disputes redressal commissions across India play a vital role in addressing grievances and ensuring fair resolutions for citizens. Matters handled by the principal bench highlight the structured approach taken by judicial authorities in managing appeals and consumer protection cases.

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *