Introduction to the Legal Proceeding
Legal matters involving prominent banking institutions often entail complex details and multiple parties. A notable case identifier involves the litigation between Javeda Begum alongside co-appellants and the State Bank of India. This formal proceeding brought forward specific grievances for judicial review before a designated quorum.
Background of the Appellants
The primary appellant in this matter is Smt. Javeda Begum, described as the wife of the late Vaziruddin, residing in the Hyderabad area. Alongside her stands the second appellant, Smt. Asna Farkhunda Raj, who resides internationally in Canada. Due to her overseas residence, she was officially represented in the proceedings by her General Power of Attorney holder, who holds a professional background as a Deputy Director of Investigation.
Respondent Institution
The opposing party in this legal action is the State Bank of India. Historically recognized as the State Bank of Hyderabad prior to its institutional merger, the banking entity was officially represented in the matter by its Chief General Manager located at the principal office in Hyderabad.
Legal Representation
Every formal judicial proceeding requires structured advocacy to present arguments effectively. In this particular dispute, the appellants and complainants secured legal counsel through their designated advocate to represent their interests before the forum. Conversely, the respondent banking institution presented its case through a party-in-person representation rather than utilizing external legal counsel.
Judicial Quorum and Panel
The adjudication of this dispute was managed by a specialized bench consisting of multiple members with distinct judicial and non-judicial responsibilities. The quorum was led by the presiding officer functioning in a non-judicial capacity, supported by judicial members responsible for evaluating the legal merits, statutory compliance, and factual matrices presented by both sides.
Timeline and Date of Decision
The official proceedings and final determinations associated with this bench hearing were formally recorded on a specific date in late summer. The formal session took place on Wednesday, the second day of September, in the year two thousand twenty-six. The written perspective and findings of the judicial panel were authored primarily by one of the judicial members of the quorum.
Conclusion of the Proceeding
Legal disputes of this nature highlight the intricate processes involved when individuals seek resolution against major financial corporations. The documented hearing involving Javeda Begum and the banking institution serves as a matter of public legal record, reflecting the ongoing administration of justice within the jurisdiction.
