In a recent judicial session held on July 27, 2026, the legal proceedings concerning Nitin Malik and 52 other petitioners against the State of Haryana and others moved forward under the adjudication of Hon’ble Bharatkumar Pandya.
The courtroom proceedings featured legal representation from multiple advocates appearing for both the complainants and the opposing parties. Ms. Priyanjali Singh, Ms. Aishwarya Dobhal, Mr. Apratim Animesh Thakur, and Mr. Albar Qureshi presented arguments alongside complainant-in-person Mr. Jagdish Sharma.
Opposite Party No. 3 was represented in the hearings by a legal team comprising Mr. Sanchit Garga, Mr. Kunal Rana, and Mr. Shashwat Jaiswal. According to official court documentation, the composition of the opposing parties underwent significant modifications during the earlier stages of the litigation lifecycle.
Official records indicate that pursuant to a specific judicial order dated September 6, 2017, the original Opposite Parties 1 and 2 were formally removed from the array of parties. These deleted entities previously included the State of Haryana through its Secretary within the Ministry of Housing and Urban Development in Chandigarh, alongside the Director General of Town and Country Planning.
Consequently, following these procedural adjustments, M/s Piyush Buildwell India Ltd. remains as the sole active opposing party in the ongoing complaint. Legal analysts note that streamlining the respondent parties helps focus the adjudication process on the remaining corporate entity.
The current phase of the lawsuit centers on resolving longstanding grievances raised by the large group of petitioners led by Nitin Malik. Stakeholders across the real estate and legal sectors continue to monitor the proceedings closely for potential precedents regarding builder-buyer disputes in the region.
As the case progresses toward future hearings under the direction of the presiding authority, both legal teams prepare for subsequent submissions. Observers anticipate further procedural updates as the tribunal examines the remaining arguments presented by the involved parties.
Disclaimer: This article is published for general news and informational purposes only. While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, readers are advised to verify important information from official sources. The publisher shall not be responsible for any loss or inconvenience arising from reliance on the information published.
