Legal Counsel Seeks Withdrawal in Long-Standing Cold Storage Insurance Dispute
Photo by SHOX ART on Pexels

Legal Counsel Seeks Withdrawal in Long-Standing Cold Storage Insurance Dispute

On August 12, 2026, legal proceedings involving M/S Hili Multipurpose Cold Storage Pvt. Ltd. and M/S New India Assurance Company alongside three other respondents reached a procedural turning point during a scheduled hearing.

According to official records, legal representative Mr. Sushant Sarkar appeared via online proceedings to address the tribunal.

Mr. Sarkar formally stated that despite numerous communications sent to the complainant, no response or instructions had been received.

Consequently, counsel requested formal permission from the bench to withdraw from representing the complainant in the ongoing matter.

Meanwhile, Mr. Bisla appeared on behalf of the opposing parties during the hearing.

According to reports, the complex litigation previously traveled up to the Apex Court for judicial interpretation.

The central legal question involved the strict forfeiture of rights regarding the filing of a written defense if submitted outside the stipulated 30-day window or the additional 15-day grace period.

Following a definitive ruling by the highest court, the matter was remanded back via an official order dated August 22, 2024.

Official data shows that the case was subsequently slated to advance toward a final hearing following the remand.

The tribunal scheduled multiple dates to expedite the proceedings and evaluate the substantive merits of the insurance dispute.

On November 14, 2025, the adjudicating authority documented the extensive procedural background in a formal interim order.

The withdrawal request by the complainant’s counsel introduces a new procedural hurdle for the cold storage enterprise.

Industry analysts note that delays in commercial insurance litigation often prolong financial recovery for businesses dealing with asset damage.

Observers will monitor the upcoming tribunal sessions to see whether the complainant appoints new counsel or if the case proceeds ex parte.

The final outcome of this dispute may provide further clarity on procedural compliance timelines within commercial insurance claims.

Disclaimer: This article is published for general news and informational purposes only. While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy, readers are advised to verify important information from official sources. The publisher shall not be responsible for any loss or inconvenience arising from reliance on the information published.

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *