Black piggy bank surrounded by a variety of coins on a white surface, symbolizing savings and finance.
Photo by cottonbro studio on Pexels

Employees Provident Fund Organisation vs Gopal Chandra Sharma Case Overview

Introduction to the Legal Dispute

Legal proceedings often involve multiple parties addressing complex grievances regarding administrative duties and consumer rights. A notable matter came before the consumer dispute redressal commission in Jaipur, Rajasthan, addressing significant concerns raised by citizens against institutional bodies. The formal review process brought together representatives from government organizations, housing boards, and individual claimants.

Case Background and Parties Involved

The formal matter is registered under appeal number 151 of 2026. The primary appellant and second opposing party in the original complaint is the Employees Provident Fund Organisation operating under the Ministry of Labor, Government of India, represented through its regional commissioner located at Nidhi Bhawan, Vidut Marg, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur, Rajasthan. The legal counsel representing this central body during the hearings was an advocate named R.K. Verma.

The first respondent and original complainant in the proceedings is Gopal Chandra Sharma, a sixty-four-year-old individual residing in Malviya Nagar, Jaipur. His legal interests during the hearings were represented by counsel Rustam Sheikh. The second respondent and initial first opposing party is the Rajasthan Housing Board, represented by its chairman from the housing building located at Janpath, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur. The counsel representing this housing authority was advocate Laxman Singh.

Timeline of Hearings and Final Decision

The judicial bench responsible for reviewing the arguments and delivering the final judgment consisted of the commission president alongside a designated member. Both the appellant and the respondents presented their arguments during the formal hearing session which took place on August 3, 2026. Following a comprehensive review of the submissions and legal arguments presented by all respective counsels, the final decision and verdict in the matter was officially pronounced on October 7, 2026.

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

    Leave a Reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *